The portal Narod.hr, citing a statement by historian Vlatka Vukelić, claims that there was no children’s camp in Sisak in 1942 but rather a “humanitarian shelter”; however, relevant historiographical works and archival sources describe this site as part of the NDH camp system and classify it as a children’s camp.
Media reports about an alleged “provocation” at the promotion of Vlaho Bukovac’s autobiography, organized by the Serbian Cultural Society Prosvjeta in Pula, misinterpret the nature of the event
Contrary to MP Mlinarić’s claim, numerous sources confirm killings and disappearances of civilians of Serbian nationality in Vukovar in 1991, even though there are still no final court verdicts for these cases.
Several posts on social media and news portals claim that the flower symbol on the poster for the exhibition “Serbian Woman, Heroine of the Great War” carries war-propagandistic meaning or represents a provocation.
The claim made by Member of Parliament Josip Jurčević that there is reasonable suspicion against Milorad Pupovac for war crimes is not true, as there are no formal decisions by the competent state authorities confirming the existence of such suspicion.
According to historical sources, the Miroslav Gospel was commissioned by Miroslav, Prince of Hum, and written in the territory of present-day Montenegro. Claims by Slobodan Prosperov Novak that the manuscript originated near Ston and represents a “Croatian codex” are not supported by relevant historiographical or philological literature.
The claim by Member of Parliament Stipe Mlinarić that African swine fever (ASF) first appeared in Jagodnjak is incorrect. ASF cases in Croatia were recorded several years earlier in various municipalities, and in 2025 the disease was confirmed in other locations before Jagodnjak.
The claim that “For Home – Ready” is merely a variation of older military salutes is incorrect. Historical sources show that this rallying cry first appeared within the Ustaša movement and the Independent State of Croatia, not in the Austro-Hungarian period or earlier times.
The claim that 44 civilians were killed in Operation Storm misinterprets the Hague Tribunal’s ruling and significantly downplays the scale of casualties. The Hague Tribunal confirmed 44 cases within the indictment, which does not reflect the total number of victims; both official and NGO data point to hundreds of civilians killed.
The claim by Prof. Tado Jurić that Croats in the 19th century were twice as numerous as Serbs rests on a selective use of unreliable and methodologically questionable sources. When the first comparable censuses are taken into account, it becomes clear that the difference between Croats and Serbs was far smaller than double – amounting to only a few percentage points.